Byrd v. Riggs
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Chief Justice.
1. A caveat to a will signifies a contest in which the pleadings consist of the will, the petition for probate, the caveat or allegations against the will and all amendments thereto (Redfearn on Wills, Ch. 10); and no traverse of the caveat is necessary, since the burden is already upon the propounder to establish the existence of a valid will as the contest is determined by the pleadings already filed therein. Accordingly, the exception pendente lite to the judgment refusing the motion to dismiss on the ground that no traverse was filed was without merit.
2. On appeal…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McIntyre v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- McDowell v. McDowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Field v. BrantleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Foster v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Mulherin v. KennedySupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Payne v. PayneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Yancey v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- Byrd v. RiggsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- Long v. LongCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Graham v. StansellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963