Legal Opinion
Langan v. Cheshire
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided May 15, 1951No. 17443PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wyatt, Justice.
1. It is not contended that the original will of James Ross Cheshire should not be admitted to probate, but the codicil is attacked on several grounds. Counsel for the plaintiff in error treat the bill of exceptions as presenting three questions for decision by this court. It will be so treated here.
The first question presented is raised by the exceptions pendente lite, the general grounds of the motion for new trial, and special grounds 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, and 13 of the motion for new trial, and concerns the establishment, as a part of the last will and testament of James…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Slaughter v. HeathSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- McIntyre v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Trustees of the University of Georgia v. DenmarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Brown v. KendrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Foster v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Skelton v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Bryan v. NortonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Cornelius v. CrosbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Carter v. First United Methodist ChurchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- King v. BennettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.