Legal Opinion
In Re FA Potts & Co., Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 4, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-7571PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GILES, District Judge.
Appellants Karl and Wilma Goos (“the Gooses”) seek to collect post-petition rent payments from F.A. Potts & Co., Inc., and GNP Land Company (“Debtors”) for the period May 1984 through April 1990. The Gooses filed a motion in bankruptcy court, arguing that these payments should be allowed as an administrative expense pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(A). The bankruptcy court denied the Gooses’ motion, and they appealed to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158. For the reasons set forth below, this court will reverse and remand for a determination of the fair…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kneeland v. American Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- American Anthracite & Bituminous Coal Corp. v. Leonardo Arrivabene, S.A., Tramp Tankers Corporation of Liberia and Estate of Hector C. DracoulisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Century Glove, Inc. v. First American Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Matter of Fred Sanders Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
- In Re Rhymes, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In the Matter of Handy Andy Home Improvement Centers, Inc., Debtor-Appellee. Appeal of National Terminals CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Polysat, Inc. v. Union Tank Car Co. (In Re Polysat, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- In Re Lease-A-Fleet, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- In Re Muma Services Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2002
- In Re HQ Global Holdings, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.