Legal Opinion

State v. Tate

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided August 19, 1985No. 0537PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shaw, Judge:

Appellant Larry Eugene Tate was originally charged in two separate indictments with one count of forgery; however, before trial one of the indictments was amended to include both counts. Before the state presented its evidence, Tate moved to sever the two counts; again after presenting his own evidence, Tate moved for a mistrial based on mis-joinder of the counts. The circuit court denied these motions. We reverse and remand for separate trials.

The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether trying a defendant at once for two identical but unrelated felonies violates his right to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. LyleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  2. State v. McClellanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  3. City of Greenville v. ChapmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. TuckerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Muir v. C.R. Bard, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  3. State v. MiddletonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. HarryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  5. State v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API