Legal Opinion

Wiedner v. Wiedner

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 20, 1921No. 696PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Milam County; John Watson, Judge. Suit by W. Wiedner against Louisa Wied-ner. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

[1] Appellant filed this suit against his wife, praying for divorce and for partition of certain property which he alleged was community. On a trial to the court without a jury,- the divorce was denied, and no order was made affecting the property. This case, on its facts, comes clearly within the rule announced in Haygood v. Haygood, 25 Tex. 576; Beck v. Beck, 63 Tex. 34; Jones v. Jones, 60 Tex., 451; Hale v. Hale, 47 Tex. 336, 26 Am. Rep. 294; Bohan v. Bohan, 56 S. W. 959, denying divorces where the parties are guilty of recrimination. As said by Chief Justice Willie, in Beck v. Beck, supra:

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Hale v. HaleTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Beck v. BeckTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Haygood v. HaygoodTexas Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Greenlaw v. DilworthTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  2. Jasper v. JasperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API