Legal Opinion

Howard v. Edwards

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided October 11, 1984No. 56,145PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foth, C.J.:

This is an appeal from an order denying attorney fees claimed to have been earned under K.S.A. 40-3113a(e) by recovering personal injury protection (PIP) benefits for plaintiff s insurer. The trial court’s order was based on a finding that the “recovery” for which attorney fees was sought did not represent PIP benefits but instead constituted advance payment of damages under K.S.A. 40-275. Although the appeal has been prosecuted in the names of the parties to the original tort action, the only persons interested in the appeal are plaintiff s attorney, James M. Sheeley, and her…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Manzanares v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Claflin v. WalshSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Farm & City Insurance v. American Standard InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. Ballweg v. Farmers InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  5. Harrah v. HarrahSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Servos v. CorbettCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1999
  2. Mast v. KinnardCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
  3. Musse v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API