Kinsman v. R.F. Post Company
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Kenworthey, J.,
In this workmen’s compensation case tbe claim is for disability resulting from a femoral bernia alleged to have been caused by an accident within the scope of claimant’s employment. There was evidence offered that the hernia was caused by an accident. Claimant concedes, however, that if the ‘hernia amendment,’ Act of June 21, 1939, P. L. 520 §1, added to Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, art. Ill, §306 (h), 77 PS §515, applies, he has not overcome the presumption nor met the burden of proof provided in that Act.
The question is whether the hernia amendment is applicable…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pollock v. Clairton School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Fye v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Testa v. National Radiator Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Orlandini v. Volpe Coal CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Flock v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kolonik v. Hudson Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Nemonich v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Loveless v. Garrison Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1972