Legal Opinion

Fye v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 24, 1938No. Appeal, 176PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

The employer in this workmen’s compensation case has appealed from a judgment entered below upon an award by the referee, affirmed by the board, of compensation to claimant for the death of her husband, Joshua Fye, employed by it for a number of years as a car repairman.

Notwithstanding some inaccuracies in pleading and the failure of the compensation authorities to make underlying findings which would indicate clearly the sense in which they used the term “over-exertion” in their ultimate finding of fact, the case may be disposed of upon its merits as it now stands.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Witt v. Witt's Food Mkt. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. McFadden v. Lehigh Navigation Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Betts v. American Stores Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Pelusi v. MandesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Amentlar v. New Upper Lehigh Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Palermo v. North East Preserving Works, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Rovere v. Interstate Cemetery Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Davis v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Eckman v. U. S. Lock & Hardware Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Orlandini v. Volpe Coal CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API