Legal Opinion
Verburg v. Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided January 9, 2018No. CASE NO. 1:13–CV–1328; CASE NO. 1:14–CV–18; CASE NO. 1:14–CV–60; CASE NO. 1:14–CV–234PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT J. JONKER, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiffs in the above-captioned actions have filed a common motion in limine that seeks to prevent Defendants from introducing evidence or argument at trial regarding a bona fide error defense. Defendants oppose the motion, and in all the above cases have incorporated the argument contained in the Response brief filed in Case No. 1:13-cv-1328 (ECF No. 237).1 After considering Plaintiffs' Motion and Defendants' Response, Plaintiffs' Motion will be GRANTED.
*773A motion in limine is defined as "any motion, whether made before or during trial, to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich, L.P.A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Barlow v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- Dawson Wise v. Zwicker & Associates PCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich LPACourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Thompson v. Midland Funding, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
- BARENBAUM v. HAYT, HAYT & LANDAU, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019