Legal Opinion
Grimes v. County of Merced
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 29, 1928No. Docket No. 3413PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON (R. L.), J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in a suit in assumpsit for the repayment of an assessment levied by a water protection district of Merced County, on the ground that the proposed improvements for which the district was organized and the purpose for which the assessment was levied were abandoned.
Prior to 1920 the board of supervisors of Merced County organized the Bear Creek Protection District of that county, pursuant to the protection district statutes of California of 1895, and subsequent amendments thereto (DBering’s General Laws, 1923,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bradford v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
- Valentine v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- McConville v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Miller & Lux v. BatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Newberry v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Southern Service Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Flynn v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Brandt v. RileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Franchise Tax Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Whyte v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.