Dudley v. Conely
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Carpenter, J. Assumpsit by Harlan J. Dudley and Charles P. Collins against Clarence Conely and Oscar Schloeman, co-partners as Clarence Conely & Co., principáis, and Christian Hosbach and William Kemter, sureties, upon a replevin bond. From a judgment for plaintiffs on verdict directed by the court, defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
Suit on replevin bond. The case in which the bond was given was commenced in the circuit court for Wayne county August 14, 1894, in which Clarence Conely and a copartner were plaintiffs, and Collins and Dudley defendants. In October, 1895, verdict was given, and judgment rendered thereon in February following. That case was removed to this court, whero it was decided in 1896 (Conely v. Dudley, 111 Mich. 122 [69 N. W. 151]), and the judgment reversed. In December, 1897, the case was again tried, and a verdict directed by the court below for the plaintiffs. Time to move for a new trial and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bullock v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Evers v. SagerMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- People ex rel. Clinton v. LaninsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Fish ex rel. Smith v. BarbourMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Conely v. DudleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- J. L. Hudson Co. v. BarnettMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Kent Probate Judge Ex Rel. Heaney v. American Employers Ins.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Miller v. MaherMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Walker v. ArcherMichigan Supreme Court · 1901