In re L.A.
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
¶ 1. Patient L.A. appeals from a family court decision granting the Commissioner of the Department of Health’s petition for involuntary psychiatric medication. Patient argues that the trial court erred by applying the wrong standard to determine whether he is competent to refuse medication. The family court ruled that patient was incompetent because he refused beneficial medications. We reverse and remand for a new hearing because the involuntary medication statute mandates that the family court decide whether patient is capable of making a decision about medication and appreciating its…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. SeegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. BallardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Prater v. City of BurnsideCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In re T.C.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- Murdoch v. Town of ShelburneSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- In re G.G.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- In re L.A.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- In re I.G.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.