In re I.G.

¶ 1. In this case, an involuntarily hospitalized patient diagnosed with schizophrenia appeals the trial court’s order allowing for his involuntary medication. Patient argues that the court erred by (1) incorrectly applying the competency standard under 18 V.S.A. § 7625, and (2) failing to address whether a previously prepared document reflecting his desire not to be given psychiatric medication was a “competently expressed written . . . preference! ] regarding medication” under 18 V.S.A. § 7627(b). We conclude that the trial court’s findings support its conclusion under § 7625, but agree that…