Amalgamated Zinc & Lead Co. v. Bay State Zinc Mining Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Jasper Circuit Court, — Ron. Hugh Dabbs, Judge. (1) Injunction is the proper remedy in this case, upon the pleadings and evidence set out in the record. Kamp v. Schrader, 45 Mo. 505; Lytle v. James, 98 Mo. App. 337; Jack Harvard Co. v. Continental Zinc Co., 106 Mo.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Jasper Circuit Court, — Ron. Hugh Dabbs, Judge. (1) Injunction is the proper remedy in this case, upon the pleadings and evidence set out in the record. Kamp v. Schrader, 45 Mo. 505; Lytle v. James, 98 Mo. App. 337; Jack Harvard Co. v. Continental Zinc Co., 106 Mo. App'. 66'. (2) No part of the defense set up hy defendant in its answer was proven, except the fact that when this suit was brought, appellant, a foreign corporation, had not obtained a license to do business in the State of Missouri, but it was shown that shortly after bringing suit, and long prior to the April term,…
1Opinion of the CourtGeaves, J.
Plaintiff, a corporation under the laws of New Jersey, on December 27, 1905, filed a petition in the circuit court of Jasper, the purpose of which was to enjoin and restrain the defendant from mining on the east half of a certain tract of ground known and described as Lot 107 in the north*10east quarter of section 4, township 27, range 33, in Jasper county, Missouri, as shown by a certain plat of said ground for mining purposes as made out and posted by the Granby Mining & Smelting Company, the owner in fee of said ground. Plaintiff claimed the right to mine said east half of Lot. 107 by virtue…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cary-Lombard Lumber Co. v. ThomasTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
- Tri-State Amusement Co. v. Forest Park Highlands Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- United Shoe Machinery Co. v. RamloseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- Carson-Rand Co. v. SternSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Roeder v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Connecticut Fire Insurance v. CoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
- United Shoe Machinery Co. v. RamloseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
- Booth v. ScottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
- Parke, Davis & Co. v. MullettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- Rhines v. Skinner Packing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1922
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.