Legal Opinion

Hulo v. City of Redmond

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 15, 1975No. 3594-42912-1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Pursuant to an appropriate resolution authorized by RCW 35.43.070, the City Council of defendant City of Redmond adopted an ordinance creating a local improvement district (LID) for the construction of street improvements. Plaintiff Hulo and other owners of property subject to assessment brought this action to declare the LID invalid. The trial judge ruled that the suit was barred as untimely by RCW 35.43.100 1 and granted the City’s motion for a summary judgment of dismissal.

Plaintiffs contend that the limitation provided by RCW 35.43.100 is inapplicable because in conflict with RCW…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Randolph v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Goetter v. City of ColvilleWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Lansinger v. Local Improvement District 6368Washington Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Federal Way v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  2. Fisher Bros. Corp. v. Des Moines Sewer Dist.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Knott v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API