Lansinger v. Local Improvement District 6368

Appellants contend that they should not be required to pay a $1,203.50 local improvement district assessment for a sanitary sewer constructed adjacent to the rear of their property because it does not benefit their property. Defendant City of Seattle asserts that the plaintiffs failed to make a timely appeal from the ordinance *256confirming the assessment and that under the statutes .this ended the matter. The case is here on appellants’. appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their appeal to the superior court.. The Lansingers, husband and wife, owned a house and lot within Seattle’s LID No.…