Legal Opinion
Dauer v. Verizon Communications Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 17, 2009No. 03 Civ. 05047(PGG)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PAUL G. GARDEPHE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Maryanne Dauer (“Dauer”) and Joan Pucino (“Pucino”) were employed by Defendant Verizon Communications Inc. (“Verizon”) or its predecessor companies as field technicians. Plaintiffs claim that beginning in the mid-1990s, Verizon subjected them to disparate treatment and a hostile work environment because of their sex in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e (“Title VII”), and the New York State Human Rights Law, New York Executive Law § 296 (“NYSHRL”). In addition, they claim that…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Saenger v. Montefiore Medical CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Alexander v. Westbury Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Hall v. New York City Department of TransportationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Workneh v. Pall Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Desir v. Board of Cooperative Educational ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.