Legal Opinion
Reising v. Deutsche Dampfschiffahrts-Gesellschaft Hansa
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 15, 1926No. 46PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
The appellant was a citizen of Germany, residing in this country when, between January 1, 1916, and March 1,1917, he performed services and expended moneys for the Deutsche Dampfsehiffahrts-Gesellschaft Hansa, a German corporation operating a steamship line known as the Hansa Line. He was naturalized a citizen of the United States on April 25, 1924, and filed a claim for and began this siñt on July 17, 1924, against the steamship company, the Alien Property Custodian and the Treasurer of the United States to obtain payment of his debt under section 9 (e) of the Trading…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Stewart v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Swiss National Insurance v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Sutherland, Alien Property Custodian v. Mayer Mayer v. Sutherland, Alien Property Custodian Reis v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hicks v. Anchor Packing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1926
- Norris v. BergdollDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1927