Legal Opinion

Armstead v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development (In Re Armstead)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 21, 1989No. 19-10475PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID A. SCHOLL, Bankruptcy Judge.

A. INTRODUCTION

The instant proceeding brings to our court, as a debtor, the same mortgagor who was the plaintiff in a sharply-worded Opinion of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, reversing a denial of her application for an assignment of her federally-insured mortgage to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (hereinafter referred to as “HUD”). Armstead v. U.S. Dep’t of HUD, 815 F.2d 278 (3d Cir.1987). In this sequel to the Court of Appeals’ decision, we conclude that HUD’s denial of the Debtor’s application was arbitrary and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Frisby v. United States Department Of Housing And Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  3. James and Joyce Ferrell v. Samuel R. Pierce, Secretary of Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Barone v. Strouse, Greenberg Mortgage Co. (In Re Campfire Shop, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Ferrell v. PierceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Armstead v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development (In Re Armstead)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Cronkhite v. KempDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API