Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Boltz

Rockingham County Circuit Court

Decided April 9, 1986No. Case No. 9819Published

1Opinion of the Court

By JUDGE PERRY W. SARVER

The Court has before it Defendant’s Motion to Strike after hearing the Commonwealth’s evidence on December 30, 1985. The Motion is based upon two grounds.(1) The Rockingham County Ordinance is invalid since there has been no amendment to the Ordinance since that amendment made in August, 1978 (Supp. # 2), and the Virginia Code section that it attempts to incorporate by reference was adopted subsequent to that date.(2) If the Ordinance is invalid, then the arrest warrant is invalid and the Commonwealth cannot amend an invalid warrant of arrest.(3) If the Court denies…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. StewartArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Collins v. City of RadfordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
  3. Malouf v. City of RoanokeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
  4. Robinson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1966
  5. State v. LookabillNebraska Supreme Court · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API