Legal Opinion

Malouf v. City of Roanoke

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided February 24, 1941No. Record No. 2379PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHudgins, J.

Joe Malouf, without requiring' a warrant to be issued, was convicted by a police justice of the city of Roanoke for conducting a “baseball pool” on September 24, 1939, in violation of a city ordinance. He immediately sought an appeal and gave the required bail. Thereafter the police justice issued a warrant under date of September 26,1939, entered a judgment of conviction as of September 25,1939, and noted an appeal on the warrant. These papers were duly filed with the clerk of the Hustings Court of the city of Roanoke and the case placed on the trial docket.

"When the case was called for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bank of North America v. WheelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1859
  2. Keyser v. FarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Thomas Gemmell, Inc. v. Svea Fire & Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1936
  4. Campbell v. HowardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
  5. Bullard v. McArdleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ZamaniSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
  2. Rawls v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  3. Humphreys v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
  4. Burford v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1942
  5. Baugh v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API