Brakke v. Beardsley
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
TODD, Justice.
This case is presented in such a peculiar and difficult procedural tangle that a decision on the merits would be inappropriate. We dismiss the appeal on the grounds that the appellants’ intervention for the sole purpose of bringing this appeal was untimely.
On June 17,1977, Ronald Brakke received a building permit to construct a storage facility with grain bins. His plans disclosed a building setback of 47 feet. The Clay County ordinance required a setback of 125 feet, but apparently provided for a variance based on existing building lines. Relying on the permit, plaintiff began…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moyer v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- Standard Bank & Trust Co. v. Village of Oak LawnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Avery v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- GRIGGS, COOPER & CO. INC. v. Lauer's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Erickson v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Rhode Island v. FlamCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- In Re QuinnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Omegon, Inc. v. City of MinnetonkaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- In re Access to Law Enforcement Records Relating to the Arrest of QuinnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.