Legal Opinion

State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters v. Lee

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 26, 1977No. 47171PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PETERSON, Justice.

Steiner’s Liquors, Inc. (Steiner’s), on the grounds that it was an indispensable party, appeals from denial of its motion to vacate a judgment entered and satisfied in a declaratory judgment action in which it was not joined and from denial of its motion to intervene to appeal from the judgment. We affirm.

This case arises out of a multi-party action seeking damages for personal injuries under the Dram Shop Act and common-law tort. Clifford Sass, by his mother and natural guardian, commenced the action against Steiner’s after Sass was beaten and injured by several youths, one…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Doerr v. WarnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. Miller v. Market Men's Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  3. Thibault v. BostromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harbal v. Federal Land Bank of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Martin v. DicklichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. Erickson v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. SST, INC. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Rhode Island v. FlamCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API