Legal Opinion
D'Amico v. Cox Creek Refining Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided June 2, 1989No. Civ. A. No. HAR-89-1337PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CATHERINE C. BLAKE, United States Magistrate.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
On January 27, 1989, the United Electrical Radio and Machine Workers of America (“the union”) filed several charges with the National Labor Relations Board (“the Board”) alleging that Cox Creek Refining Company (“the company”) had engaged in, and was continuing to engage in, unfair labor practices within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. (“the Act”). The charges were referred to Louis J. D’Amico, Regional Director of Region 5 of the board, whose office is located in Baltimore, Maryland.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- In re SkolnickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Burlington Industries v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Matter of Firestorm 1991Washington Supreme Court · 1996
- D'AMICO v. Cox Creek Refining Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1989
- Kobell v. Reid Plastics, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- United States v. Electro-Voice, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1995
- Ahearn v. Rescare West VirginiaDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.