Legal Opinion
D'AMICO v. Cox Creek Refining Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided June 14, 1989No. Civ. A. HAR 89-1337PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HARGROVE, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Currently pending before this Court is a request for injunctive relief under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations (TaftHartley) Act (“the Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 160(j) (1982). On 27 January 1989, Local 125 of the United Electrical Radio and Machine Workers of America (“Union”) filed charges with the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) alleging that Cox Creek Refining Company (“Company”) had engaged in, and was continuing to engage in, unfair labor practices in violation of sections 8(a)(1), (3), and (5) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- In re SkolnickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Seeler v. Trading Port, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Kobell v. Suburban Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Kaynard v. Palby Lingerie, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rivera-Vega v. ConAgra, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1995
- D'AMICO v. Townsend Culinary, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1998
- Ledford ex rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Mining Specialists, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1993
- Timmins Ex Rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Narricot Industries, L.P.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008