Legal Opinion
Doe v. Abington Friends School
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 15, 2007No. 05-1405PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMBRO, Circuit Judge.
Joseph and Julie Doe, 1 on behalf of themselves and their minor son, Benjamin, filed suit against Abington Friends School (“Abington”) and three of its employees. Their suit, grounded for federal purposes in the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), see Pub.L. No. 101-336, 104 Stat. 327 (1990) (codified at 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-213), alleges that Abington did not adequately accommodate Benjamin’s diagnosed Attention Deficit Disorder and related learning disabilities. 2 It claims as well that the individual defendants subjected Benjamin to a discriminatory environment…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Dowling v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Radich v. GoodeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. MassachusettsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- Kendel v. Local 17-A United Food & Commercial WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Spann Ex Rel. Hopkins v. Word of Faith Christian Center ChurchDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2008
- Doe v. Abington Friends SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Boltz-Rubinstein v. Bank of Am. (In re Boltz-Rubinstein)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.