Legal Opinion
Spates v. Office of Attorney General
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 28, 2016No. 14-14-00741-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Ken Wise, Justice
The Office of the Attorney General, Child Support Division (“the OAG”), intervened in a lawsuit between Prodigy Services, LLC and Eni U.S. Operating Company, seeking to collect on three child support liens against Christopher Spates. Spates, a member and the owner of Prodigy, was not a party to the lawsuit. The trial court granted a charging order in favor of the OAG against Spates’s membership interest in - Prodigy, requiring Prodigy to pay the amounts of unsatisfied child support judgments against Spates out of any distribution to which Spates would otherwise be…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- CMH HOMES v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- M.O. Dental Lab v. RapeTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Endicott Johnson Corp. v. Encyclopedia Press, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Schultz v. Fifth Judicial District Court of Appeals at DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sohani v. SunesaraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Farmer v. Farmer and First Western v. Lakota Lake Camp, LLC and FarmerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Gonzalez Obregon v. RomoDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2025
- In re DilickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Infracon USA, LLC and Horacio Lopez Montes v. Funding Circle Partners, LP, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.