Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pangburn v. Sifford

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1921No. Docket No. 94Published

Appeal from Cass; DesVoignes (L. Burget), J. Bill by John L. Pangburn against Floyd Sifford and another for the specific performance of a land contract. From a decree for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1DissentBird, J.

This bill was filed by plaintiff to compel defendants to convey to him a lot in the city of Dowagiac. The trial court made a decree enforcing the agreement of the parties and defendants have appealed. Defendants listed their house and lot with Davidson & Van Antwerp, real estate brokers, with instructions to sell the same for $2,500. The offer coming to the attention of plaintiff, he looked the premises over and advised the brokers he would purchase it for that sum, and paid thereon $25. Defendants gave him the following receipt:

“Dowagiac, Michigan,

February 18, 1920.

“Received of J. C.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. HeavenrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Mier v. HaddenMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Goodspeed v. Wiard Plow Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Hollingshead v. MorrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Neal v. FinleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API