People v. Boyd
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Tom, J.P.
At issue on this appeal is whether acceptance of defendant’s guilty plea in exchange for a negotiated determinate sentence without advising him of the duration of the period of postrelease supervision to be imposed or the permissible statutory range for the period of such supervision deprived him of the ability “to knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently choose among alternative courses of action” so as to require reversal of the judgment of conviction (People v Catu, 4 NY3d 242, 245 [2005]). Under the particular facts of this matter, this Court concludes that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. CatuNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- People v. LoureeNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. HillNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. BoydNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. CullenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. GrimmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.