Legal Opinion

Lorraine Bates v. Bankers Life and Casualty Co

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 24, 2017No. 14-35397PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s orders striking their class allegations and dismissing their claims under Oregon’s financial abuse statute, Oregon Revised Statute § 124.110. We dismiss the appeal in part because we lack jurisdiction to review the order striking the class allegations. As to the proper interpretation of Oregon Revised Statute § 124.110, we certify this question to the Oregon Supreme Court in an order filed concurrently with this opinion.

I

Plaintiffs are elderly Oregonians or their successors who purchased long-term healthcare insurance policies sold by Bankers Life…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Henderson v. ShinsekiSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. United Airlines, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. BHS LAW LLP v. SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
  2. Caplan v. Budget Van Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2020
  3. Dahl v. American Bankers Insurance Company of FloridaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
  4. Lee v. Plex, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
  5. Nichols v. eHealthInsurance Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API