Lorraine Bates v. Bankers Life and Casualty Co
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s orders striking their class allegations and dismissing their claims under Oregon’s financial abuse statute, Oregon Revised Statute § 124.110. We dismiss the appeal in part because we lack jurisdiction to review the order striking the class allegations. As to the proper interpretation of Oregon Revised Statute § 124.110, we certify this question to the Oregon Supreme Court in an order filed concurrently with this opinion.
I
Plaintiffs are elderly Oregonians or their successors who purchased long-term healthcare insurance policies sold by Bankers Life…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Henderson v. ShinsekiSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United Airlines, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- BHS LAW LLP v. SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Caplan v. Budget Van Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2020
- Dahl v. American Bankers Insurance Company of FloridaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
- Lee v. Plex, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Nichols v. eHealthInsurance Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.