Legal Opinion
Cassini v. City of Orange
New Jersey Tax Court
Decided July 8, 1997PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMALL, J.T.C.
The plaintiffs in these eight matters sought review of their 1996 tax assessments by the Essex County Board of Taxation. The assessments were all affirmed by the county board under judgment code 34 requiring income and expense statements (N.J.S.A. 54:4-34). Following appeal by the plaintiffs from the county board judgments to the Tax Court, the defendant, City of Orange, now moves to dismiss the complaints for failure of the plaintiffs to comply with N.J.S.A. 54:4-34, as amended by L.1979, c. 91, sec. 1 (commonly known as Chapter 91). Defendant asserts that in each case,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Rock Island, Arkansas & Louisiana Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- F.M.C. Stores Co. v. Borough of Morris PlainsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Ocean Pines, Ltd. v. Borough of Point PleasantSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Terrace View Gardens v. Township of DoverNew Jersey Tax Court · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Green v. East OrangeNew Jersey Tax Court · 2004
- Southland Corp. v. Dover TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 2004
- TOWNE OAKS v. Borough of South Bound BrookNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Tri-Martin Associates II, LLC v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Tax Court · 2004
- James-Dale Enterprises, Inc. v. Township of Berkeley HeightsNew Jersey Tax Court · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.