Legal Opinion

James-Dale Enterprises, Inc. v. Township of Berkeley Heights

New Jersey Tax Court

Decided July 25, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DeALMEIDA, P.J.T.C.

The question before the court is whether a tax assessor’s request for income and expense information pursuant to N.J.S.A. 54:4-34, commonly known as Chapter 91, (see L. 1979, c. 91), must include an explanation of the consequences of a taxpayer’s failure to respond to the request in a timely fashion. For the reasons stated more fully below, the court concludes that the assessor need not explain the penalty for failing to comply with the request because Chapter 91 requires the assessor to include with the request a copy of the statute, which plainly sets forth the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. F.M.C. Stores Co. v. Borough of Morris PlainsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  2. Gruber v. Mayor and Tp. Committee of Raritan Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  3. Ocean Pines, Ltd. v. Borough of Point PleasantSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  4. Jamouneau v. Division of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  5. Keyes Martin & Co. v. Director, Div. of PurchaseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Yeshivat v. Borough of ParamusNew Jersey Tax Court · 2012
  2. 440 Rt 17 Ptrns LLC v. Borough of Hasbrouck HeightsNew Jersey Tax Court · 2014
  3. Waterside Villas Holdings, LLC v. Monroe TownshipNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API