Legal Opinion

State v. Quint

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 13, 1982PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARTER, Justice.

After a jury trial in the Superior Court, Aroostook County, the defendant was convicted of operating a motor vehicle under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312 (1980). As the sole ground of appeal here, the defendant claims that the court’s particular instructions requiring the jury to continue its deliberations after it had reported a deadlock were coercive in nature and constitute reversible error. We sustain the appeal.

The jury commenced its deliberations at 10:23 in the morning of the second day of trial. It returned an hour later after…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Jenkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. People v. GainerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. United States v. John FlanneryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
  5. People v. BarrazaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. DeLongSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  2. State v. HerbestSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
  3. State v. GooginsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  4. State v. McArthurConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  5. State v. WeidulSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API