Legal Opinion

Vandenbergh v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1960No. 9963PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Castles

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs. The complaint states two causes of aetion based upon two separate shipments by the defendant. The first cause of aetion is to recover the value of certain personal property which was lost in transit between Forest Hills, New York, and Helena, Montana. The second cause of aetion is to recover damages for the impairment of a piano which was being transported from Oakland, California, to Helena. The jury found for plaintiffs on both causes of action and assessed damages at $3,000 on the first cause of action and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Boston & Maine Railroad v. HookerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. NothnagleSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Great Northern Railway Co. v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. William A. Cordingley v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  2. Cordingley v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 1976
  3. Semi-Metals, Inc. v. Pinter Bros.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  4. Resolute Insurance Co. v. Morgan Drive-Away, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Shirazi v. Greyhound CorporationMontana Supreme Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API