Legal Opinion
In Re Conservatorship of Riebel
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 1, 2001No. CX-01-53PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
A petition has been filed seeking review of the February 20, 2001, order of the court of appeals dismissing the appeal in the above-referenced case. Also filed with the petition was a document entitled Notice of Appeal to Supreme Court. Both the petition and the notice of appeal purport to be brought by Joanne Marie Rie-bel, but are signed only by Darlene C. Sammarco, who is not a lawyer. The notice of appeal states that “Sammarco has valid Durable Power of Attorney and Health Care Proxy dated October 31, 1996, which allows Sammarco to act on behalf of her daughter [Riebel] in legal…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sharood v. HatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Cowern v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Gardner v. ConwaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ColemanOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Kohlman v. Western Pennsylvania HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Palihawadange Fernando v. Martha Gay Weaver SapukotanaMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
- Eby v. Johnston Law Office, P.C.Court of Appeals of Nevada · 2022
- Snyder v. MartinDelaware Family Court · 2001
- Myran D. Jones, II v. Rose BrooksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Klapmeier v. Cirrus Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.