Legal Opinion
Vonherberg v. City of Seattle
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided May 17, 1927No. 568PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
In addition to the facts sot out in Re Puget Sound Power & Light Co. (Von Herberg v. City of Seattle et al.) 18 F.(2d) 57, it is only necessary to say that upon motion of tie plaintiff a temporary restraining order was issued. The defendant city appeared and filed various motions and demurrers, upon disposition of which in the state court an answer and cross-complaint was filed, and moved that the Puget Sound Power & Light Company be brought in as a necessary party. The motion to bring in the additional party was granted, and thereafter the power company removed the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Willcox v. Consolidated Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- McGrain v. DaughertySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- City of Knoxville v. Knoxville Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- California v. San Pablo & Tulare RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. WarringtonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955
- Wilson v. WilsonNew York Supreme Court · 1943