United States Ex Rel. Rogers v. Richmond
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
J. JOSEPH SMITH, Chief Judge.
Respondent moves that the writer disqualify himself from hearing any further proceeding in this case and refer the matter to another judge- of this court. The basis of the motion is that this judge has a prejudgment of the issues in the ease and a personal bias against the detectives involved and in favor of the cause of the relator Rogers. To support this claim and in attempted conformity with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 144, the respondent, Mark S. Richmond, has made a sworn affidavit setting out alleged facts which are claimed to show this bias. Respondent…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Ex Parte American Steel Barrel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- In Re J. P. Linahan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Burton S. Knapp v. John P. KinseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- Craven v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1927
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. VanceIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
- United States v. Gus Sclafani and Ben RossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Broome v. SimonDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Miera v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. LagardoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.