Legal Opinion
Klein v. Cornelius
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 27, 2015No. 14-4024PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the court-appointed receiver for Winsome Investment Trust, a business entity whose founder, Robert J. Andres, caused it to illegally distribute funds as part of a Ponzi scheme. The court found that Andres had fraudulently transferred funds from Winsome to William T. Cornelius and his law firm, Cornelius & Salhab, and that the receiver could recover these funds on Winsome’s behalf under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA). Cornelius, who was unaware of the fraud, raises several challenges…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Peacock v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Caplin v. Marine Midland Grace Trust Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Ralph S. Janvey, in His Capacity as Court-Appointed Receiver for the Stanford International Bank, Limited Official Stanford Investors Committee v. the Golf Channel, Incorporated Tgc, L.L.C., Doing Business as Golf ChannelTexas Supreme Court · 2016
- Lewis v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- Georgelas v. Desert Hill VenturesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- Ross v. JenkinsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2018
- Hafen v. HowellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.