Legal Opinion
Rodriguez v. Ancona
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 22, 2005No. AC 24012PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
This case involves small sums and large principles. The plaintiff, Mayra Rodriguez, appeals the amount of damages and attorney’s fees she was awarded by the trial court following its judgment that the defendant, Michael Ancona, wrongfully withheld a security deposit and illegally entered the tenancy then occupied by the plaintiff. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly awarded her (1) damages, pursuant to General Statutes § 47a-18a, 1 amounting to only one month of the plaintiffs portion of the subsidized rent and (2) attorney’s fees, pursuant to § 47a-18a,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Schoonmaker v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Eldridge v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Texas-Ohio Power, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Steiger v. J. S. Builders, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Freeman v. Alamo Management Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Perez v. D AND L TRACTOR TRAILER SCHOOLConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Altschuler v. MingroneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. SuretteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Costanzo v. MulshineConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- HASLAM-JAMES v. LawrenceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.