Legal Opinion

HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 31, 2012No. AC 32761Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEAR, J.

The plaintiff, Katari Haslam-James, appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of the defendant, Kimberly Lawrence, on two counts of her revised entry and detainer complaint. The plaintiff claims that the court erred in (1) concluding that the defendant’s actions did not constitute an unlawful entry in violation of General Statutes § 47a-16 and thereby entitle her to damages under General Statutes § 47a-18a and (2) concluding that the defendant’s actions did not violate the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq. We affirm the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Daddona v. Liberty Mobile Home Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Manifold v. RagagliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  3. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency v. Landmark Investment Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. Shortell v. CavanaghSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  5. Bengtson v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API