Legal Opinion
Norair Engineering Corp. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 15, 1998No. Civ.A. DKC 96-3980PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHASANOW, District Judge.
Currently pending and ready for resolution are Plaintiff Norair Engineering Corporation’s (“Norair”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Defendant Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority’s (“WMATA”) Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, and a Motion to Intervene by Slattery Associates, Inc. (“Slattery”) and G.T. Group, Inc. (“G.T.Group”) (collectively “the Interve-nors”). WMATA has opposed the Interve-nors’ motion. No hearing is deemed necessary and the court now rules pursuant to Local Rule 105.6.
I. Facts
Norair and WMATA entered into a Joint…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Breda Transportation, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Breda Transportation, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001