Legal Opinion
Reeves v. Queen City Transportation, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided June 22, 1998No. Civ.A. 97-B-810PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
Defendants, the Public Utilities Commission of the State of Colorado and the individual Commissioners thereof, Robert J. Hix, Vincent Majkowski, and R. Brent Mderfer (collectively, “the PUC”), move to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). The motion is adequately briefed and oral argument will not materially aid its resolution. For the reasons set forth below, I grant the PUC’s motion to dismiss.
I. PLEADING STANDARDS
A court may dismiss a complaint for “failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.”…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hulett v. City of SyracuseDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2017
- Noel v. New York City Taxi & Limousine CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Disability Advocates, Inc. v. PatersonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Donnika Ivy v. Michael WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Wendel v. Florida Department of Highway Safety & Motor VehiclesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.