Thomas v. SEAMAN
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Chief Justice Jones,
This action in equity was brought to set aside a deed on grounds that it was procured by fraud and undue influence. The court below entered a decree adjudging the disputed deed null and void and ordering the appellants, Dewey H. Seaman (“Dewey”) and Esther L. Seaman (“Esther”), grantees, to reconvey the property to the grantor, Beulah E. Seaman (“Beulah”). As Beulah is now deceased, she is represented for the purpose of this appeal by Joan E. Thomas (“Joan”), executrix of the estate.
This appeal raises the questions whether the evidence supports a finding that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Neuman v. Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Broida v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Luther v. LutherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Ralston v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. ShaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Gibbs v. ErnstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Bash v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Nina Michael v. Shiley, Inc. Hospital Products Group, Inc., (Formerly Howmedica, Inc.) Pfizer, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Klemow v. Time IncorporatedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Moser v. DeSettaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.