Legal Opinion
Molnar v. Hedden
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 27, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
260 N.J. Super. 133 (1992)
615 A.2d 647
SUSAN L. MOLNAR, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
DOUGLAS M. HEDDEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 1, 1992.
Decided October 27, 1992.
Before Judges PRESSLER, R.S. COHEN and MUIR, JR.
Ronald M. Katkocin argued the cause for appellant (Markwardt & Katkocin, attorneys).
Elizabeth Macron argued the cause for respondent (Gertler & Hanna and Brotman & Graziano, attorneys; Elizabeth Macron and Nicholas Krochta, on the joint brief).
The opinion of the court was delivered by PRESSLER, P.J.A.D.
The important procedural question…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Rothensies v. Electric Storage Battery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Harr v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Wm. Blanchard Co. v. Beach Concrete Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- T. E. Stoner, Administrator of the Estate of James Kenneth Crowe v. William S. TerranellaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- Beneficial Finance Co. of Atl. City v. SwaggertySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Prevratil v. MohrSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Molnar v. HeddenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Greely v. GreelySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- Prevratil v. MohrSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996