Legal Opinion
Prevratil v. Mohr
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided July 10, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
145 N.J. 180 (1996)
678 A.2d 243
JOSEPH PREVRATIL AND LISA PREVRATIL, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
GEORGE MOHR AND RICH HILL, TRANSPORTATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued November 28, 1995.
Decided July 10, 1996.
Kenneth S. Javerbaum argued the cause for appellants (Javerbaum Wurgaft & Hicks, attorneys; Mr. Javerbaum and Eric G. Kahn, on the brief).
Modestino Carbone argued the cause for respondents (McDonald, Nathan & Carbone, attorneys).
The opinion of the Court was delivered by POLLOCK, J.
The primary issue is whether we should create an exception from the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Cogdell v. Hospital Center at OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- DiTrolio v. AntilesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Faught Ex Rel. Faught v. WashamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Crispin v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Daewoo Electronics America Inc. v. Opta Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017