Legal Opinion

Trentman v. Kappel

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 27, 2002No. 5-00-0475PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kuehn

This case comes to us on Glenn Trentman’s appeal from the trial court’s July 26, 2000, order denying his posttrial motion. Because we conclude that a motion to strike the appeal, taken with the case, is dispositive regarding this court’s lack of jurisdiction, we cannot consider his appeal.

Illinois has a set of rules and procedures in place by which all legal proceedings are bound. These rules are not mere suggestions and not aspirational in nature. See Bright v. Dicke, 166 Ill. 2d 204, 210, 652 N.E.2d 275, 278 (1995). The rules are meant to be followed by all who seek justice in the court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bright v. DickeIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Kwak v. St. Anthony De Padua HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. Portock v. FreemanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. Predny v. Village of Park ForestAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Spurgeon v. Alton Memorial HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of KunschAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  2. Lowenthal v. McDonaldAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  3. Rocha v. FedEx Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2021
  4. Manning v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  5. In re Estate of KunschAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API