Portock v. Freeman

Plaintiff, Peter Portock, brought action against defendant, Robert Freeman, for injuries allegedly sustained on August 21, 1970, when plaintiff’s car was struck from the rear by defendant’s car. At trial, defendant admitted liability but denied that plaintiff had sustained any injuries resulting from the accident. On July 21,1975, the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff but awarded him zero damages; judgment was entered on the verdict. PlaintifFs motion for a new trial was denied and he appeals.

A detailed review of evidence and plaintiff’s contentions on appeal is unnecessary…