Legal Opinion

West v. Municipality of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 2007No. S-12164PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A dog bit or pawed a seven-week-old baby, causing several scratches along the baby's face and forehead. After an investigation, an Anchorage animal control enforcement officer concluded that the dog should be classified as a "level three" animal, defined by the city code as one that, "while under restraint, inflicts an aggressive bite or causes any physical injury to any human." An administrative hearing officer upheld this classification, as did the superior court. The dog's owner appeals. Because the hearing officer applied the correct burden of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rose v. Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Johansen v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Fernandes v. PortwineAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Spenard Action Committee v. Lot 3, Block 1, Evergreen SubdivisionAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Thoeni v. Consumer Electronic ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. Planned Parenthood of the Great NorthwestAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Smeal Fire Apparatus Co. v. KreikemeierNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Patrick v. Municipality of Anchorage, Anchorage Transportation CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Alaska Police Standards Council v. ParcellAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Sapp v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API