Legal Opinion

Auwarter v. Kroll

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1916No. 12694PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Webster, J., entered December 7, 1914, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The respondent, plaintiff below, brought this action against the appellant, setting up three causes of *348action; the first upon a promise to pay a sum certain in consideration of the transfer of a certificate of sale of the property of a mining corporation; the second, for a balance due on an account for labor and services performed by the respondent for the appellant between July 21, 1908, and September 30, 1909; and the third, for labor and services performed by the respondent for the appellant between September 30, 1909, and September 30, 1910. After issue had been joined on the complaint, a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Eagle Iron Co. v. BaughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  2. Kelly v. Ning Yung Benevolent Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  3. Auwarter v. KrollWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Ham v. Brown Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  5. Lemcke v. Funk & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wharton v. Tierney-Toner Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Blackwell v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. State v. StanleyWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Swafford v. LevineWashington Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API