In the Matter of Davis
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
This matter is before the court because the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline found respondent Alan Joel Davis guilty of misconduct as an attorney and recommended that he be publicly reprimanded. There are four *534sanctions set forth in our Rules dealing with misconduct: (1) private reprimand, (2) public reprimand, (3) indefinite suspension, and (4) disbarment. Misconduuct is admitted. The sole issue before the court is a determination of the proper sanction. Respondent submits that the sanction should not be more severe than a public reprimand.
The three-man panel which heard…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Burns v. ClaytonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
3Cited by4 opinions
- In the Matter of BrunerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
- In the Matter of DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
- In re TrexlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- In the Matter of DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981